This website has been revised,
please click here for the new website pages.

Extracts and Comments | Discussions


Swaziland Greenstone Mine EIA - Comments

Peta Masson

A number of submissions have been made concerning the Greenstone Mine EIA. Some of these have covered the broader issues of the ethics of mining within a protected area, Swaziland’s credibility internationally and regionally within conservation circles, should mining be allowed to go ahead, and then more detail on the social implications of the development, its effect on tourism in Swaziland and the economic viability of the mine. I feel that many of the concerns raised are valid, they illustrate the flawed nature of the impact assessment and point out real issues which must be adequately answered before decisions are taken to approve the development.

Having read parts of the EIA document, I would like to comment on the accuracy of data interpretation regarding the botanical diversity in the proposed leasehold mine area.

1. Northeastern mountain grassland.

2. Afromontane Forest.

3. Species diversity and conservation worthy species.

4. Representativeness of the survey.

5. General Comments on the Mitigation of Impacts .

5.1 Waste Management.

It is becoming increasingly important for Companies to demonstrate responsible environmental management by having stringent pollution control measures and acceptable waste management strategies. Swaziland has recently reviewed legislation concerning pollution standards, indicating a committment to meeting international requirements. It is assumed that new developments such as the proposed Mine, would have to demonstrate compliance with these standards.The EIA report does not appear to adequately address the methods of waste disposal and pollution control .

5.2 No clearance of Forest

Having visited the proposed mining site a number of times, I fail to see how the chert can be mined without disturbing the forest or removing the trees. It is practically impossible to reach the site without removing a significant amount of forest vegetation. If, by some miracle, this were possible, then the extended impact of people in the area would undoubtedly contribute to further degradation of the site.

5.3 Conservation Management of the area

The Consultant mentions that fires in the area would be speedily dealt with, should mining be allowed to occur. This is highly improbable, given that people are the main cause of fires . Furthermore, experience elsewhere has shown that combatting fires requires increased awareness and does not simply result from an increased presence in the area.

The few points raised above, I hope, place into context the importance of the area from a plant diversity perspective. I hope that they will be considered along with the rest of the submissions.

MS PETA MASSON
P.O. Box 906
Mbabane
SWAZILAND

References:

Bredenkamp G, Granger E. and van Rooyen N (1996). Northeastern mountain grassland. In Low AB. Rebelo AG (Eds) Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Dept of Environment Affairs and Tourism. Pretoria.

Hilliard O.M.and Burtt B.L. (1971). Streptocarpus. An African Plant study. 410pp.

Masson P. H. (1991). Forest composition and conservation status in the Swaziland Highveld. Presentation delivered at the xiiith AETFAT Congress held in Zomba, Malawi.


Extracts and Comments | Discussions